Yes, the ACC’s Playoff Was Disappointing. But That Doesn’t Mean Clemson and SMU Didn’t Belong.
The ACC’s Playoff experience in the 2023-24 season might not have lived up to expectations, especially as Clemson and SMU struggled in their respective matchups. However, it’s important to remember that both teams had earned their spots based on strong seasons and should not be diminished because of their playoff performances.
Clemson, despite the disappointment of falling short in big moments, still represented a program that has consistently been a force in college football. While the Tigers were outmatched in their bowl game, they finished the season with a respectable record and still possess one of the top recruiting classes in the country. Under Dabo Swinney, Clemson has built a powerhouse capable of competing at the highest level, even if their 2023-24 playoff bid didn’t live up to the hype.
Similarly, SMU earned its place as a deserving playoff contender, marking an important milestone for the Mustangs’ program. Though they didn’t have the same historical pedigree as Clemson, their impressive rise under Rhett Lashlee reflected growth and potential. SMU’s inclusion signified a shift in college football, showing that Group of Five teams can compete with Power Five programs, especially when they perform at a high level throughout the season.
Both teams’ playoff appearances were earned through hard work and success in their respective conferences. While they may not have made deep playoff runs, their inclusion in the conversation shows that college football’s landscape is evolving. Clemson and SMU may not have delivered on the grand stage, but their presence in the postseason proved they belonged — a step forward for both programs.